Our fascination with extraterrestrial life outside of our familiar human peeps is a concept that has been around since people knew there were things beyond the clouds, and science fiction horror movies have been a great way to make sure we never get bored of the thought. The science fiction horror genre has always explored the depths of psychological and fear of things we aren't familiar with. I believe that there are two Sci-fi films that embody these perfectly. The Thing 1982, and Vivaarium. While these two movies are both psychologically horrifying diving deep into the fear of the unknown, they are drastically different. The Thing 1982, is a movie about a group of researchers in Antarctica who come to find an extraterrestrial being that will take the form of its victims to get to the next, successfully multiplying. The researchers go through periods of distrust, and paranoia as any of them could be “The Thing.” There are a few good gorey moments in the film as well since it is in the body horror category. The second film, Vivarium, starts with the ideal suburban couple who find themselves in the repetitive, inescapable suburbs with the name Yonder they had briefly checked out after being influenced by the strange salesman. They are given a child to raise, stuck in never-ending suburbia. The child is a creepy inhuman thing that is later found to be an alien. As the couple is going mad they realize there is no escape despite doing everything they can, and that their current situation is a cycle that doesn't end with just their deaths. See? Drastically different. Different, but they both have similar elements that give you a lingering sense of fear that you try to ignore most of the time your eyes are glued to the TV screen. Starting off with the settings of both places. The Thing is set in the distant, isolated, frozen tundra that is Antarctica. Living in a small research lab protecting them from the deadly plain they are surrounded by, they are fine while inside. Until they rescue a dog. The reality of the horrific situation they are living in is that they are completely isolated here, and you are trying to self-insert yourself into their shoes while you watch. Being so far away and due to the environment, no one would be able to help them out if something were to go wrong. Or the fact that even if they could get help, they can't because interacting with society would endanger the entire planet. Exposing the rest of the world to the aliens. While watching the movie you try not to think about it too much, but that is what makes you afraid of the movie, a few grotesque moments aren't going to stay will you like this type of fear. In Vivarium, on the other hand, the fear of not being able to escape is still there, but in a different equally as disturbing way. In this movie, as they drive away from the house they were looking at, they realize the road never ends and they end up at house number nine no matter where they go. They try walking, for hours, and end up at the same flat. It happens so suddenly and sneakily that I as a viewer didn't realize this would be the main conflict of the entire movie until they are given a baby. They are stuck in this never-ending surreal suburban neighborhood with a monster they cannot escape. With no contact or help from the outside world, it gives the same isolated feeling that the writers of The Thing used. Both films though made in entirely different decades, completely different world issues, and completely different settings have the same fear factor. That is being completely isolated, from something that is trying to get to you. With no hope from anyone on the outside to come save you.
Next, the aliens themselves. The alien from The Thing does not use its own appearance but rather other people. It doesn’t have its own appearance. The scare factor here is that the thing is trying to multiply and take over, aren't we all? It will take the form of others, and use people's instincts and paranoia against them to pretend to be a human and multiply. At first, it will take over the body or recreate it by copying someone's cells (according to the scrapped sequel) of the living being infected. Then the alien will imitate that person in order to be able to get close to other people and spread to infect another person by getting one of its cells into someone's bloodstream or saliva. Once it gets someone, one way or another, it distorts and mangles the original form of the person into something straight out of a hellish nightmare. The creature itself is just cells that can rapidly create more of its own cells to replace someone else. It can imitate dogs, and humans, and can even survive in drops of blood. Now for Vivarium and its parasite. In Vivarium the alien takes the form of a spotless and proper British man who looks like the insult “Stuck up,” personified. Think of Mark Zuckerberg in a suit. These creatures can manipulate and use different universes as little storage cubbies for different humans that are trapped there, while the creatures can move through the different worlds simultaneously. These creatures look just like humans, they just look slightly off. They age rapidly as well, and they use humans' naive nature against them in order to raise their young. The alien children will follow and imitate the people around them, their “parents,” as a way to fit into a crowd later in life. The creature's voice is eerie, with no strictly masculine or feminine features or content accents. No human features actually. Its voice will change constantly, it's creepy. It screeches when it doesn’t get what it wants. The aliens also have toad-like pockets on the side of their necks. The TV in the house has moving shapes and odd sounds that humans cannot understand. There's a book for the kid as well, again that humans cannot understand. Similarly to The Thing, the aliens in Vivarium also are trying to Imitate people in order to multiply. Very different creatures, one is at least a multicellular organism while the other is a little less. But both creatures have the same motives, to multiply using the intelligent enough minds and psyche of humans.
Lastly, how the different types of horror end in the same terrified feeling. The Thing is more of a classic horror movie, it relies on body horror and practical effects to give you that sense of dread that makes these movies so great, like most movies of its time did. It hands you the thing you're supposed to be afraid of on a bloody silver platter. Now in Vivarium, you have to really think to be afraid of this movie. There are some elements that are only scary if you think of what they imply. Vivarium is a classic example of a psychological horror movie, even with artsy foreshadowing and some dead birds. It has a sense of dark humor. As well as being one of those movies that's very equipped for the current times, trying to mimic real life outside of the surreal twist of the movie. Vivarium also has a few visual scares, but they are nothing compared to the special effects and creations of the thing's identity. The thing doesn't have many psychological elements, thank god it doesn’t the movie can't get any more horrific.
In conclusion, The Thing and Vivarium are two great examples of science fiction horror movies of the times. They are such different movies, they were made almost forty years apart yet they are still so similar when it comes to the movie themes and antagonists. Both dabble in the fear of isolation and paranoia towards one another. And both have an uncanny monster that
is pretending to be human so it can multiply quickly. They are both two sides of the same story.
Next, the aliens themselves. The alien from The Thing does not use its own appearance but rather other people. It doesn’t have its own appearance. The scare factor here is that the thing is trying to multiply and take over, aren't we all? It will take the form of others, and use people's instincts and paranoia against them to pretend to be a human and multiply. At first, it will take over the body or recreate it by copying someone's cells (according to the scrapped sequel) of the living being infected. Then the alien will imitate that person in order to be able to get close to other people and spread to infect another person by getting one of its cells into someone's bloodstream or saliva. Once it gets someone, one way or another, it distorts and mangles the original form of the person into something straight out of a hellish nightmare. The creature itself is just cells that can rapidly create more of its own cells to replace someone else. It can imitate dogs, and humans, and can even survive in drops of blood. Now for Vivarium and its parasite. In Vivarium the alien takes the form of a spotless and proper British man who looks like the insult “Stuck up,” personified. Think of Mark Zuckerberg in a suit. These creatures can manipulate and use different universes as little storage cubbies for different humans that are trapped there, while the creatures can move through the different worlds simultaneously. These creatures look just like humans, they just look slightly off. They age rapidly as well, and they use humans' naive nature against them in order to raise their young. The alien children will follow and imitate the people around them, their “parents,” as a way to fit into a crowd later in life. The creature's voice is eerie, with no strictly masculine or feminine features or content accents. No human features actually. Its voice will change constantly, it's creepy. It screeches when it doesn’t get what it wants. The aliens also have toad-like pockets on the side of their necks. The TV in the house has moving shapes and odd sounds that humans cannot understand. There's a book for the kid as well, again that humans cannot understand. Similarly to The Thing, the aliens in Vivarium also are trying to Imitate people in order to multiply. Very different creatures, one is at least a multicellular organism while the other is a little less. But both creatures have the same motives, to multiply using the intelligent enough minds and psyche of humans.
Lastly, how the different types of horror end in the same terrified feeling. The Thing is more of a classic horror movie, it relies on body horror and practical effects to give you that sense of dread that makes these movies so great, like most movies of its time did. It hands you the thing you're supposed to be afraid of on a bloody silver platter. Now in Vivarium, you have to really think to be afraid of this movie. There are some elements that are only scary if you think of what they imply. Vivarium is a classic example of a psychological horror movie, even with artsy foreshadowing and some dead birds. It has a sense of dark humor. As well as being one of those movies that's very equipped for the current times, trying to mimic real life outside of the surreal twist of the movie. Vivarium also has a few visual scares, but they are nothing compared to the special effects and creations of the thing's identity. The thing doesn't have many psychological elements, thank god it doesn’t the movie can't get any more horrific.
In conclusion, The Thing and Vivarium are two great examples of science fiction horror movies of the times. They are such different movies, they were made almost forty years apart yet they are still so similar when it comes to the movie themes and antagonists. Both dabble in the fear of isolation and paranoia towards one another. And both have an uncanny monster that
is pretending to be human so it can multiply quickly. They are both two sides of the same story.
AI Script of Siskel and Ebert Intro
These scripts were made with CHAT GPT with a few of my edits and fixes made
To make this I gave the AI a sentence, sentence was “Write me an episode of Siskel and Ebert reviewing The name of the film.” The bot then did just that and gave me a script. I had many different AI bots make loads of these, and I picked the one that made the most sense and sounded like an episode of the segment it was replicating. These were both from Chat GPT, they were just the better options
AI Scripts
“Write me an episode of Siskel and Ebert reviewing the movie Vivarium"
Title: Siskel and Ebert Review “Vivarium”
[INTRO]
SISKEL: (Smiles) Welcome back, folks, to another episode of “Siskel and Ebert At the Movies.” I’m Gene Siskel.
EBERT: And I’m Roger Ebert. Today, we’ve got a rather intriguing film to discuss - “Vivarium.” It’s a 2019 science fiction thriller directed by Lorcan Finnegan.
SISKEL: That’s right, Roger. “Vivarium” stars Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots as a couple who find themselves trapped in a mysterious suburban nightmare. So, what did you think of it, Roger?
EBERT: Well, Gene, I found “Vivarium” to be a truly unique and unsettling experience. It’s a film that explores themes of suburban conformity and existential dread in a way that’s quite disturbing. The cinematography by MacGregor is mesmerizing, creating an eerie sense of isolation.
SISKEL: I couldn’t agree more, Roger. The film’s visual style and set design are truly striking. It’s like being trapped in a bizarre, nightmarish version of the American Dream.
EBERT: Exactly, Gene. And the performances are quite impressive. Eisenberg and Poots both excel in portraying the increasing desperation and frustration of their characters as they try to escape this seemingly endless suburban maze.
SISKEL: Eisenberg, in particular, shows a range we haven’t seen from him before. He’s not the usual neurotic character; he’s more subdued, almost numb, which adds to the film’s eerie atmosphere.
EBERT: Indeed, Gene. Now, while I appreciate the film’s ambition and its ability to provoke thought, I must admit that “Vivarium” is not for everyone. It’s a slow burn, and its symbolism might be too abstract for some viewers.
SISKEL: That’s a fair point, Roger. “Vivarium” is definitely a film that requires patience and an open mind. It’s more about the experience and the questions it raises than providing clear answers.
EBERT: Absolutely. And while I found it thought-provoking, I can see how some might find it frustrating or perplexing. It’s a film that sticks with you long after the credits roll, and that’s something I appreciate in cinema.
SISKEL: Well said, Roger. So, in conclusion, “Vivarium” is a visually stunning and thought-provoking film that’s not afraid to explore the darker corners of suburbia. It’s not for everyone, but for those willing to dive into its enigmatic world, it’s a trip worth taking.
EBERT: I couldn’t have put it better myself, Gene. “Vivarium” is a haunting and unforgettable cinematic experience. That’s it for this episode of “Siskel and Ebert At the Movies.” Thanks for joining us, and we’ll see you next time.[OUTRO]
“Write me an episode on Siskel and Ebert reviewing the movie, The Thing 1982.”
e: Siskel and Elbert Review “The Thing” (1982)
[INTRO]
SISKEL: (Smiles) Welcome, movie lovers, to another episode of “Siskel and Elbert At the Movies.” I’m Gene Siskel.
ELBERT: And I’m Elbert. Today, we’ve got a classic horror film on our hands - “The Thing.” Directed by John Carpenter and released in 1982.
SISKEL: That’s right, Elbert. This movie has become a benchmark in the horror genre. It stars Kurt Russell as the grizzled R.J. MacReady, facing off against an otherworldly, shape-shifting creature in the Antarctic. So, Elbert, what did you think of “The Thing”?
ELBERT: Gene, I have to say, “The Thing” is a masterclass in suspense and paranoia. Carpenter masterfully builds tension throughout the film, and the practical effects by Rob Bottin are absolutely mind-blowing for the time.
SISKEL: I couldn’t agree more, Elbert. The creature effects in this film are nothing short of astonishing. They’re still incredibly effective and terrifying even today.
ELBERT: And let’s not forget the performances, Gene. Kurt Russell is outstanding as MacReady. He’s a flawed hero, and you can feel the mounting dread and distrust among the characters.
SISKEL: Absolutely, Elbert. The ensemble cast, including Wilford Brimley and Keith David, delivers strong performances, adding depth to their characters and making us genuinely care about their fates.
ELBERT: I have to say, though, Gene, one of the most remarkable things about “The Thing” is its ambiguity. The uncertainty about who is infected and who isn’t keeps you on the edge of your seat.
SISKEL: You’re spot on there, Elbert. The film’s ability to create a sense of paranoia and suspicion is a testament to Carpenter’s skill as a director.
ELBERT: However, I can understand that some viewers might find the film’s ambiguity frustrating. It leaves many questions unanswered, which can be polarizing.
SISKEL: That’s true, Elbert. “The Thing” doesn’t offer easy explanations, and it leaves you with a sense of unease that lingers long after the credits roll. But for me, that’s one of its strengths.
ELBERT: Agreed, Gene. “The Thing” is a true horror classic that has stood the test of time. Its atmosphere, practical effects, and suspenseful storytelling make it a must-see for any horror enthusiast.
SISKEL: Absolutely, Elbert. So, in conclusion, “The Thing” is a chilling masterpiece that continues to terrify and captivate audiences. That’s it for this episode of “Siskel and Elbert At the Movies.” Thanks for joining us, and we’ll see you next time.
[OUTRO]
These scripts were made with CHAT GPT with a few of my edits and fixes made
To make this I gave the AI a sentence, sentence was “Write me an episode of Siskel and Ebert reviewing The name of the film.” The bot then did just that and gave me a script. I had many different AI bots make loads of these, and I picked the one that made the most sense and sounded like an episode of the segment it was replicating. These were both from Chat GPT, they were just the better options
AI Scripts
“Write me an episode of Siskel and Ebert reviewing the movie Vivarium"
Title: Siskel and Ebert Review “Vivarium”
[INTRO]
SISKEL: (Smiles) Welcome back, folks, to another episode of “Siskel and Ebert At the Movies.” I’m Gene Siskel.
EBERT: And I’m Roger Ebert. Today, we’ve got a rather intriguing film to discuss - “Vivarium.” It’s a 2019 science fiction thriller directed by Lorcan Finnegan.
SISKEL: That’s right, Roger. “Vivarium” stars Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots as a couple who find themselves trapped in a mysterious suburban nightmare. So, what did you think of it, Roger?
EBERT: Well, Gene, I found “Vivarium” to be a truly unique and unsettling experience. It’s a film that explores themes of suburban conformity and existential dread in a way that’s quite disturbing. The cinematography by MacGregor is mesmerizing, creating an eerie sense of isolation.
SISKEL: I couldn’t agree more, Roger. The film’s visual style and set design are truly striking. It’s like being trapped in a bizarre, nightmarish version of the American Dream.
EBERT: Exactly, Gene. And the performances are quite impressive. Eisenberg and Poots both excel in portraying the increasing desperation and frustration of their characters as they try to escape this seemingly endless suburban maze.
SISKEL: Eisenberg, in particular, shows a range we haven’t seen from him before. He’s not the usual neurotic character; he’s more subdued, almost numb, which adds to the film’s eerie atmosphere.
EBERT: Indeed, Gene. Now, while I appreciate the film’s ambition and its ability to provoke thought, I must admit that “Vivarium” is not for everyone. It’s a slow burn, and its symbolism might be too abstract for some viewers.
SISKEL: That’s a fair point, Roger. “Vivarium” is definitely a film that requires patience and an open mind. It’s more about the experience and the questions it raises than providing clear answers.
EBERT: Absolutely. And while I found it thought-provoking, I can see how some might find it frustrating or perplexing. It’s a film that sticks with you long after the credits roll, and that’s something I appreciate in cinema.
SISKEL: Well said, Roger. So, in conclusion, “Vivarium” is a visually stunning and thought-provoking film that’s not afraid to explore the darker corners of suburbia. It’s not for everyone, but for those willing to dive into its enigmatic world, it’s a trip worth taking.
EBERT: I couldn’t have put it better myself, Gene. “Vivarium” is a haunting and unforgettable cinematic experience. That’s it for this episode of “Siskel and Ebert At the Movies.” Thanks for joining us, and we’ll see you next time.[OUTRO]
“Write me an episode on Siskel and Ebert reviewing the movie, The Thing 1982.”
e: Siskel and Elbert Review “The Thing” (1982)
[INTRO]
SISKEL: (Smiles) Welcome, movie lovers, to another episode of “Siskel and Elbert At the Movies.” I’m Gene Siskel.
ELBERT: And I’m Elbert. Today, we’ve got a classic horror film on our hands - “The Thing.” Directed by John Carpenter and released in 1982.
SISKEL: That’s right, Elbert. This movie has become a benchmark in the horror genre. It stars Kurt Russell as the grizzled R.J. MacReady, facing off against an otherworldly, shape-shifting creature in the Antarctic. So, Elbert, what did you think of “The Thing”?
ELBERT: Gene, I have to say, “The Thing” is a masterclass in suspense and paranoia. Carpenter masterfully builds tension throughout the film, and the practical effects by Rob Bottin are absolutely mind-blowing for the time.
SISKEL: I couldn’t agree more, Elbert. The creature effects in this film are nothing short of astonishing. They’re still incredibly effective and terrifying even today.
ELBERT: And let’s not forget the performances, Gene. Kurt Russell is outstanding as MacReady. He’s a flawed hero, and you can feel the mounting dread and distrust among the characters.
SISKEL: Absolutely, Elbert. The ensemble cast, including Wilford Brimley and Keith David, delivers strong performances, adding depth to their characters and making us genuinely care about their fates.
ELBERT: I have to say, though, Gene, one of the most remarkable things about “The Thing” is its ambiguity. The uncertainty about who is infected and who isn’t keeps you on the edge of your seat.
SISKEL: You’re spot on there, Elbert. The film’s ability to create a sense of paranoia and suspicion is a testament to Carpenter’s skill as a director.
ELBERT: However, I can understand that some viewers might find the film’s ambiguity frustrating. It leaves many questions unanswered, which can be polarizing.
SISKEL: That’s true, Elbert. “The Thing” doesn’t offer easy explanations, and it leaves you with a sense of unease that lingers long after the credits roll. But for me, that’s one of its strengths.
ELBERT: Agreed, Gene. “The Thing” is a true horror classic that has stood the test of time. Its atmosphere, practical effects, and suspenseful storytelling make it a must-see for any horror enthusiast.
SISKEL: Absolutely, Elbert. So, in conclusion, “The Thing” is a chilling masterpiece that continues to terrify and captivate audiences. That’s it for this episode of “Siskel and Elbert At the Movies.” Thanks for joining us, and we’ll see you next time.
[OUTRO]